Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Relics of Surpassing Interest at Greenwich

Some one hundred and fifty-eight years ago, the British public were drawn with awe and reverence -- along with not a little idle curiosity -- to Greenwich Hospital, where, in glass cases sorted by type, there lay a strange and compelling array of what had once been ordinary objects: eyeglasses, forks, spoons, bits of uniform cloth, cigar cases, cap-bands, and dozens of books. These items, so unremarkable without their strange provenance, were the last material effects of the once-vaunted Arctic expedition led by Sir John Franklin, which had sailed past the very grounds of that hospital, waved on by cheerful crowds, a mere fourteen years before.

The sight was compelling in a way that no case of crown jewels, no orient pearls, could ever have been; the crowds filled the room and spilled out the doorway far into the street. Wilkie Collins, writing about the last letters of James Fitzjames, who had been Franklin's second aboard HMS "Erebus," knew why:
At every point of the dread pilgrimage from this world to the next, some domestic trace remains that appeals tenderly to the memory, and that leads us on, from the day when the last illness began, to the day that left us parted on a sudden from our brother or sister-spirit by the immeasurable gulf between Life and Eternity. The sofa on which we laid the loved figure so tenderly when the first warning weakness declared itself; the bed, never slept in since, which was the next inevitable stage in the sad journey; all the little sick-room contrivances for comfort that passed from our living hands to the one beloved hand which shall press ours in gratitude no more; the last book read to beguile the wakeful night, with the last place marked where the weary eyes closed for ever over the page; the little favourite trinkets laid aside never to be picked up again.
And now, in 2017, a great many of these relics will be seen again, re-united, as it were, with others whose trail through time took a different course: left behind on Franklin's ships, dropped from the weary hands of the last few survivors as they trekked over land, or excavated by archaeologists. Adding immediacy to the tale of woe of those last few stragglers, we have also the oral traditions of the Inuit, as recorded by those who searched for Franklin, illustrated by objects the Inuit repurposed for more practical use. And, in the innermost of sanctums, casts of the bones whose incised cut-marks verified the most difficult and distressing news of all: that the last few men, in the words of Dr. John Rae who conveyed the Inuit accounts, had turned in their desperation to the "last resource."

There is a strongly positive message here as well, though, and it's not the usual one about England's brilliant naval accomplishments. It's the Inuit testimony itself that guided modern searchers to his ships, the testimony of those who such men as Dickens derided as "the vague babble of savages." Whether in archival manuscripts, such as those of Charles Francis Hall, or in modern accounts, such as Gjoa Haven resident Sammy Kogvik's story of a strange wooden post in Terror Bay, it was the Inuit who led the way to where the lost lay low. It's my personal hope that, with the story now told in its fullest dimensions, people from the UK and around the world will come to appreciate not simply the tragedy of Franklin's expedition, but the story of intercultural understanding and co-operation that led to the unravelling of one of the great mysteries of all time.

NB: The exhibit, Death in the Ice, opens at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich on 14 July; it will appear there through the rest of the year, after which it will be shown at the Canadian Museum of History in Gatineau beginning in March of 2018.

4 comments:

  1. The repurposed artifacts are always a sense of interest to me, seeing how someone could take an object and apply it to their own more immediate use. That is a story unto itself!
    Up until last year, we had all believed the Terror would be found crushed. Its discovery (first impressions anyway) would tend to run contrary to that. My reaction wasn't that the testimony was wrong, but I re-read it to see where my misunderstanding lay! It will be interesting to see how that will all fit together.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I went yesterday, and also found the repurposed items fascinating ~ perhaps especially the ulu knife as I'd just read about how they weren't supposed to be sharpened in summer ~ but three things touched me most of all: the Victory Point Record (although I would like to have seen a full text reproduction next to it); what I can only describe as an electronic map of the Arctic as known to Europeans before the 16th century, which charted each discovery by each named expedition ~ fascinating, especially to see Captain Cook whizzing up from the Pacific side and lastly to see and hear Louie Kamookak speaking in English and Inuit (plus Inuit script ~ when was that devised?)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your account of your visit! I agree about the VP note, certainly. The syllabic system was first adopted for Inuktitut in 1865, though as you may well imagine it took some time to be disseminated into widespread usage.

      Delete
  3. hi russell,
    loving your blog.
    just wondered if you could help me with a quick question. how would crozier have got his boats UP the back's river do you think? angus@o.geek.nz

    ReplyDelete