Thursday, September 26, 2024

On the finding of James Fitzjames

It's been a long, long time since anyone last heard anything from -- or of -- James Fitzjames. His last known letter was to Edward Sabine, and it closed with his characteristic optimism and high spirits:

    Sir John is very well and full of life and energy - and we are all as happy as possible looking forward to the commencement of our real work - No one I am sure will rejoice more than yourself at our success which we all anticipate eventually if not sooner.
It was dated 11 July 1845, and the next day went into the mailbag aboard the Barretto Junior. A little less than three years later, he penned the postscript in the margin to his own note, deposited at Victory Point, and telling of the deaths that had ensued while the ships were trapped, Franklin's included, signing himself "Captain Hms Erebus." After that, silence.

Which is not quite the same thing as nothing at all. His letters to his brother and sister-in-law were privately published, and came to serve a the first words most people read of all the letters sent home by the men of the Expedition. Every account told to the Inuit, every rumor and sighting and possibility of a sighting, was scanned for evidence of his presence. Most notably, perhaps, in 1999, the novelist John Wilson published North With Franklin: The Lost Journals of James Fitzjames, in which his familiar voice, by some sort of conjuring, returned, lively as ever, and again took up his tale. Fitzjames figured in numerous other Franklin fictions, chipper and loquacious, almost never despairing. Most recently, as memorably played by Tobias Menzies in the AMC adaptation of Dan Simmons's The Terror, he came to life once more, cheered and reconciled and eventually helped to an easeful passing from a world of pain by his friend and fellow in command, Francis Crozier.

But now all this fierce imagining is done -- he himself is found, and in a place that seems to defy all our auguries -- near one of the abandoned whaleboats in Erebus Bay, a site presumably reached by the retreating men of the Expedition within the first weeks of their southward struggle. Did he perish early on from some illness or accident? Or did he go further, but then return, perhaps to look after those who could go on no more? It may never be possible to know, but what he can say is that his jawbone -- known as "mandible 226" -- shows cut-marks consistent with survival cannibalism. It's hard to imagine a state of starvation in which either the hands or face, which as Dr. Anne Keeenleyside once remarked are "the most human parts of the body," would be used as food, but that state must have been reached at some point.

There are two horizons over which an answer to these uncertainties may someday appear:  first, through the continued work of archaeologists such as Doug Stenton and his team, who are patiently surveying all the known sites on land with Franklin remains, and whose DNA database may yet identify other individuals. Secondly, we can hope that just perhaps, from the wreck of the Erebus, some written indication may come that will give us further clues. Right now, what we chiefly lack is a timeline -- after the April abandonment and the VP note all is blank -- and if either ship was ever re-manned, the records there (if found) might advance our knowledge of these events. Until then, what more can we say? 

I'll let John Wilson's fictive Fitzjames have the last word:
My dearest Elizabeth, the end will come with you in my thoughts and your picture clutched in my hand. Remember me fondly. For the last time, I wish you Good Night.

10 comments:

  1. Hello Russell,

    "Did he perish early on from some illness or accident? Or did he go further, but then return, perhaps to look after those could go on no more?"

    I saw your speculation along these lines on the FB group, and I think it is an excellent point: Our real caution right now must be that the location of his remains (and therefore, presumably, the place where he died) farther north in *space* cannot be taken to immediate place his death earlier in *time*.

    While, again, it is all speculation, the ultimate brackets of a timeline of the post-Victory Point Note chronology that we can discern from the Inuit testimonies reasonably has the scholarly consensus on a long, drawn out (to winter 1850-51) struggle. This at least suggests that the story is considerably more complicated, presumably with multiple groups and a good deal of to-ing and fro-ing, so to speak. Again, we speculate, but it just seems....*unlikely* to me that poor James Fitzjames was having his face eaten by starving shipmates in the summer of 1848, as some sort of left-behind group in any shape or form.

    And yes, the fact that they even consumed his face - their captain's face! - is a very striking and unexpected fact. It at least suggests that the final days of this group of survivors may have been very, very ugly indeed, in ways that even Dan Simmons might struggle to imagine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for a great comment! -- you're exactly right about space and time here -- time is the missing co-ordinate. And yes, a very very grisly end.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for this write-up- this is my chief source of info for modern Franklin Expedition stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Russel,
    I learned the news from the BBC, and immediately went to ‘Visions of the North’, but you had not posted your comment yet. It took me a short while to find the scientific article, which is fascinating: DNA identification is really powerful and the way they set up to screen the population to find a priori likely candidates is very impressive.
    HOWEVER, to my surprise, as a scientist myself, I observed that Stenton et al. spend a lot of time on a discussion of context and implications, with several errors and excessively assertive statements which largely follow the ‘standard reconstruction’ and ignore more recent findings (most of Woodman’s ‘Inuit testimony’ finds and of course all the implications of Erebus and Terror being found where they are). All that discussion seems out of place in a scientific article and alters a bit the confidence in the paper.
    In my field (particle physics) one would be careful to separate the particular finding (in this case the identification of one of the sailors) from an overly speculative discussion of context and consequences.

    Anyway, after this reading I went to fetch my Woodman (a pile of lose sheets by now). Then I realized you had produced a wonderful little piece of news. Keep going!

    Your faithful reader,
    Alain
    PS you must have been as moved as I was when learning of this important event. You have a stutter (“from from”) and a missing word (probably ‘who’ in “to look after those could go on no more”. It’s so rare with you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Alain, thanks very much for your thoughtful and well-informed comment. And yes, the "standard reconstruction" -- I've known Doug for many years, and his general rule is not to add anything to the story without some kind of direct physical evidence. Dave is a good friend too, though, and I'm convinced that there were indeed multiple waves of movement, from and at some point back to the ships, as it slowly became clear how daunting the prospect was of moving all the men and provisions by land. This is consistent with Inuit evidence, though because we don't have a definite timeline it can't prove it. Ultimately, I think the Inuit evidence, what Doug and company have found on land, and what the Parks Canada UAT find on this ships, will all converge -- but it may be some time, so to speak!

      Delete
    2. (thanks also for the corrections -- done!)

      Delete
  4. Fascinating story. The mind races with any number of speculations, but they must be reined in. It seems every time someone finds a new piece to the puzzle, the image becomes less clear than before! Finding Fitzjames is amazing, but it just raises more questions!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello Russell, while this doesn’t pertain to Fitzjames, I found something you might like. I run a small tik tok account that covers the Franklin expedition and while researching Terror’s Mates I found some previously unknown information on 2nd Mate Robert Thomas on this blog.

    https://wallbay89739267.wordpress.com/2024/10/31/reconstructing-robert-thomas-part-1/

    I thought you might like to see this as prior this person’s research little was known about Thomas.
    P.S. I’ve always enjoyed reading your wonderful as they’ve helped me learn a lot more about the Franklin Expedition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks much for this link -- fascinating work on Thomas -- and thanks for your kind words!

      Delete