Sunday, April 12, 2020

Le Vesconte's Will

Courtesy the LeVesconte/Wills families
As they prepared for their voyage of exploration, most of the officers of Sir John Franklin's ships "Erebus" and "Terror" took one final precaution -- they made their wills. This shouldn't be taken as an instance of some sort of fatalism; many who left on less hazardous journeys took a similar precaution -- after all, any lengthy voyage at sea in those days was an uncertain proposition; many such wills (including those of Franklin's officers) can still be had from the National Archives at Kew.

Yet the last will and testament of Henry Thomas Dundas Le Vesconte had one singular difference: it was actually written, witnessed, and signed aboard HMS "Erebus" on May 15th, 1845, very shortly before the ships sailed. Perhaps Henry was a bit of a procrastinator; perhaps some communication from his family reminded him at the last moment that he ought to attend to this business. After all, as Barbara Rich has aptly chronicled in her series of articles about Le Vesconte's fellow officer Edward Couch, even when a will existed, it was no guarantee that one's estate would not end up in the dreaded Court of Chancery. It was best to err on the side of caution.

There's nothing else too unusual about Le Vesconte's will -- like many of the officers, his own personal estate was not particularly vast or valuable -- aside from his cousin Henrietta, to whom he specially bequeathed £100 of his wages, his primary legatees were his parents -- but it lends a great sense of immediacy to the feeling aboard ship just prior to sailing:
"I, Henry Thos. Dundas Le Vesconte, Lt. in the Royal Navy, being about to proceed on a Voyage of Discovery in the Polar Seas, and desirous to dispose of what property I may be possessed of, in the event of my death, do make this solemn Will and Testament.
What is still more striking are the witnesses listed at the bottom of the second leaf: "Mr. [James] Fairholme, Lt. R.N., and J[ohn] Weekes, Carpenter." It would make sense that Fairholme would be at hand, as he was next in rank to Le Vesconte, but the attestation of the ship's carpenter adds a touching instance of trust between the ship's officers and the ordinary sailors. I've shared this find with Gordon Morris, who played Weekes in the AMC production "The Terror," and he was struck by this as well. This was no ordinary camaraderie among a ship's crew -- many of them had only just met -- but a deeper, shared sense of risks undertaken, of destiny. Today, in this strange and uncertain voyage on which everyone on Earth is now embarked, may it stand as a small, clear beacon of light for us all.

4 comments:

  1. Speaking of Fairholme March 4 2003 Bonhams London sold 11 silhouettes of the Fairholme family AND two Dags one of Walter and one of his father.It was Lot 28...Maybe Franklin scholars know of them already??Always look forward to Visions Posts........Respects Brian Wellings

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't been able to find a good record of that auction -- do you have one? The Fairholme materials I know of are those that the family chose to donate to the Canadian Museum of History, which included Fairholme's Arctic Medal, a fork in a case, and a salt print copy of one of the two Daguerreotype images of him.

      Delete
  2. Here's the Lot https://www.bonhams.com/auctions/10077/lot/28/?category=list&length=12&page=3 While I'm here, I forgot to ask you a question when you were at Greenwich in November 2017. The question is: would it have been Navy policy in the 1840s to have included Warrant Officers' deaths with Commissioned Officers' deaths in the Victory Point note? Best wishes, Brian Wellings (commenting with my wife's profile - in case you were wondering!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, fascinating! -- the Daguerreotype of James appears to be the source for the salt print now at the CMH, as he is hatless. I will definitely do what I can to learn more about it. As to your question, which I take to mean whether the figures for "officers" would have included Warrant Officers, I would think not -- it's rather like NCO's in the US Navy -- but I'll check with some Naval historians to see what they say.

      Delete